-
Clinics in Perinatology Mar 2013Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a multifactorial disorder that primarily affects premature infants. Human milk compared with formula reduces the incidence of NEC.... (Review)
Review
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a multifactorial disorder that primarily affects premature infants. Human milk compared with formula reduces the incidence of NEC. Feeding practices do not increase the incidence of NEC in preterm infants. There is no evidence supporting continuous versus intermittent tube feedings in preterm infants. In a feed-intolerant preterm infant without any other clinical and radiologic evidence of NEC, minimal enteral nutrition rather than complete suspension of enteral feeding may be an alternative. Human milk-based fortifier compared with bovine-based fortifier may reduce the incidence of NEC but additional studies are required.
Topics: Enteral Nutrition; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infant Formula; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight; Male; Milk, Human
PubMed: 23415260
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.001 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Aug 2019Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period... (Review)
Review
Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started, the delivery route, and its timing. Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery, which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight. Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition, nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding, jejunostomy tube feeding, and oral feeding. Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved quality of life. Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective, albeit with limited data. However, data on anastomotic leaks is mixed, and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding. This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach. No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question, and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique. This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Cachexia; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Enteral Nutrition; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Humans; Incidence; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Jejunostomy; Parenteral Nutrition; Quality of Life; Standard of Care; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31496622
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4427 -
Dysphagia Jun 2015Enteral feeding is the nutritional support of choice for acutely ill patients with functional gastrointestinal tracts who are unable to swallow. Several benefits... (Review)
Review
Enteral feeding is the nutritional support of choice for acutely ill patients with functional gastrointestinal tracts who are unable to swallow. Several benefits including reduced mortality and length of hospital stay have been associated with early initiation of enteral feeding. However, misplacement of conventional nasoenteric tubes is relatively common and can result in complications including pneumothorax. In addition, the need to confirm the position by X-ray can delay the start of using the tube. Eliminating these delays can help patients start feeding, and minimise the adverse impact on initiating hydration and medication. The purpose of this review was to critically examine whether electromagnetic sensor-guided enteral access systems (EMS-EAS) can help overcome the challenges of conventional nasoenteric feeding tube placement and confirmation. The Royal Society of Medicine's library performed two searches on Medline (1946-March 2014) and Embase (1947-March 2014) covering all papers on Cortrak or electromagnetic or magnetic guidance systems for feeding tubes in adults. Results from the literature search found an agreement between the radiographic and EMS-EAS confirmation of placement. EMS-EAS virtually eliminated the risk of misplacement and pneumothorax was not reported. In addition, studies showed a small decrease in the number of X-rays with EMS-EAS and a reduced average time to start feeding compared with blind placement. This review suggests that EMS-EAS reduces several complications associated with the misplacement of nasoenteric feeding tubes, and that there could be considerable improvements in mortality, morbidity, patient experience and cost if EMS-EAS is used instead of conventional methods.
Topics: Electromagnetic Phenomena; Enteral Nutrition; Esophagus; Pneumothorax
PubMed: 25943295
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9607-4 -
Nutrients Aug 2018The purpose of this overview is to make the case for the establishment and publication of standards for home enteral nutrition (HEN) therapy in adult patients who... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this overview is to make the case for the establishment and publication of standards for home enteral nutrition (HEN) therapy in adult patients who require a long-term alternative to oral feeding. Overviews can provide a broad and often comprehensive summation of a topic area and, as such, have value for those coming to a subject for the first time. It will provide a broad summation, background and rationale, review specific considerations unique to HEN (tubes, products and supplies) and we describe a recent audit of seven HEN programs which highlights tube and process related challenges. Based on the overview of the literature and our experience with the audit we propose a way forward for best home enteral nutrition care.
Topics: Enteral Nutrition; Health Services Needs and Demand; Home Care Services; Humans; Needs Assessment; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Standard of Care
PubMed: 30081546
DOI: 10.3390/nu10081020 -
Disability and Health Journal Apr 2022Tube feeding in children has a severe psychosocial impact on children and their families. Parents also feel that they have limited communication with healthcare...
BACKGROUND
Tube feeding in children has a severe psychosocial impact on children and their families. Parents also feel that they have limited communication with healthcare professionals (HCPs) about decision-making and the implications of tube feeding.
OBJECTIVE
This study focussed on the parents' experiences and expectations about tube feeding of children and a solution to improve the management and communication of it.
METHODS
We applied a design thinking method in two parts. First, focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with parents of children aged 0-10 years who are or had been tube fed and HCPs. Thereafter, two sounding boards with HCPs and parents were convened to discuss improvements in the management of tube feeding.
RESULTS
In total, 17 parents participated in the study. Two main topics derived from the focus groups and interviews: psychosocial impact and communication with HCPs. The sounding boards (five HCPs and two parents) divided the challenges of tube feeding into three stages: the moment tube feeding is considered, the insertion of the tube in the hospital, and transfer to the domestic environment and follow-up. Interview topics were used to develop a communication sheet to support the decision process of tube feeding.
CONCLUSIONS
The empowerment of parents in the process of tube feeding is important. More attention should be paid to alternatives, consequences, and planning for the long term. The developed communication sheet offers suggestions for issues to discuss and could support communication between parents and HCPs about tube feeding.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Disabled Persons; Enteral Nutrition; Health Personnel; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Parents
PubMed: 35022149
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101261 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2015Nutritional support is an essential component of critical care. Malnutrition has been associated with poor outcomes among patients in intensive care units (ICUs).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nutritional support is an essential component of critical care. Malnutrition has been associated with poor outcomes among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Evidence suggests that in patients with a functional gut, nutrition should be administered through the enteral route. One of the main concerns regarding use of the enteral route is the reduction in gastric motility that is often responsible for limited caloric intake. This increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia as well. Post-pyloric feeding, in which the feed is delivered directly into the duodenum or the jejunum, could solve these issues and provide additional benefits over routine gastric administration of the feed.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of post-pyloric feeding versus gastric feeding for critically ill adults who require enteral tube feeding.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL;2013 Issue 10), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1950 to October 2013), EMBASE (Ovid) (1980 to October 2013) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCO host (1982 to October 2013). We reran the search on 4 February 2015 and will deal with the one study of interest when we update the review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing post-pyloric versus gastric tube feeding in critically ill adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group and separately evaluated trial quality and data extraction as performed by each review author. We contacted trials authors to request missing data.
MAIN RESULTS
We pooled data from 14 trials of 1109 participants in a meta-analysis. Moderate quality evidence suggests that post-pyloric feeding is associated with low rates of pneumonia compared with gastric tube feeding (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.84). Low-quality evidence shows an increase in the percentage of total nutrient delivered to the patient by post-pyloric feeding (mean difference (MD) 7.8%, 95% CI 1.43 to 14.18).Evidence of moderate quality revealed no differences in duration of mechanical ventilation or in mortality. Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was similar between the two groups. The effect on the time required to achieve the full nutrition target was uncertain (MD -1.99 hours 95% CI -10.97 to 6.99) (very low-quality evidence). We found no evidence suggesting an increase in the rate of complications during insertion or maintenance of the tube in the post-pyloric group (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.364; RR1.63, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.86, respectively); evidence was assessed as being of low quality for both.Risk of bias was generally low in most studies, and review authors expressed concern regarding lack of blinding of the caregiver in most trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found moderate-quality evidence of a 30% lower rate of pneumonia associated with post-pyloric feeding and low-quality evidence suggesting an increase in the amount of nutrition delivered to these participants. We do not have sufficient evidence to show that other clinically important outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality and length of stay were affected by the site of tube feeding.Low-quality evidence suggests that insertion of a post-pyloric feeding tube appears to be safe and was not associated with increased complications when compared with gastric tube insertion. Placement of the post-pyloric tube can present challenges; the procedure is technically difficult, requiring expertise and sophisticated radiological or endoscopic assistance.We recommend that use of a post-pyloric feeding tube may be preferred for ICU patients for whom placement of the post-pyloric feeding tube is feasible. Findings of this review preclude recommendations regarding the best method for placing the post-pyloric feeding tube. The clinician is left with this decision, which should be based on the policies of institutional facilities and should be made on a case-by-case basis. Protocols and training for bedside placement by physicians or nurses should be evaluated.
Topics: Adult; Critical Illness; Duodenum; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrointestinal Motility; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Jejunum; Length of Stay; Malnutrition; Nutritional Status; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26241698
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008875.pub2 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Nov 2014Enteral nutrition has been strongly recommended by major scientific societies for the nutritional management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Providing severe acute... (Review)
Review
Enteral nutrition has been strongly recommended by major scientific societies for the nutritional management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Providing severe acute pancreatitis patients with enteral nutrition within the first 24-48 h of hospital admission can help improve outcomes compared to parenteral nutrition and no feeding. New research is focusing in on when and what to feed to best improve outcomes for acute pancreatitis patients. Early enteral nutrition have the potential to modulate the immune responses. Despite this consistent evidence of early enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis, clinical practice continues to vary due to individual clinician preference. Achieving the immune modulating effects of enteral nutrition heavily depend on proper placement of the feeding tube and managing any tube feeding associated complications. The current article reviews the immune modulating effects of enteral nutrition and pro- and prebiotics and suggests some practical tools that help improve the patient adherence and tolerance to the tube feeding. Proper selection of the type of the tube, close monitoring of the tube for its placement, patency and securing its proper placement and routine checking the gastric residual volume could all help improve the outcome. Using peptide-based and high medium chain triglycerides feeding formulas help improving feeding tolerance.
Topics: Acute Disease; Enteral Nutrition; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Pancreatitis; Prebiotics; Probiotics; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25473161
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16101 -
The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Aug 2007Diarrhoea is a common and serious complication of enteral tube feeding. Its pathogenesis involves antibiotic prescription, enteropathogenic colonization and abnormal... (Review)
Review
Diarrhoea is a common and serious complication of enteral tube feeding. Its pathogenesis involves antibiotic prescription, enteropathogenic colonization and abnormal colonic responses, all of which involve an interaction with the colonic microbiota. Alterations in the colonic microbiota have been identified in patients receiving enteral tube feeding and these changes may be associated with the incidence of diarrhoea. Preventing negative alterations in the colonic microbiota has therefore been investigated as a method of reducing the incidence of diarrhoea. Probiotics and prebiotics may be effective because of their suppression of enteropathogenic colonization, stimulation of immune function and modulation of colonic metabolism. Randomized controlled trials of probiotics have produced contrasting results, although Saccharomyces boulardii has been shown to reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in patients in the intensive care unit receiving enteral tube feeding. Prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides have been shown to increase the concentration of faecal bifidobacteria in healthy subjects consuming enteral formula, although this finding has not yet been confirmed in patients receiving enteral tube feeding. Furthermore, there are no clinical trials investigating the effect of a prebiotic alone on the incidence of diarrhoea. Further trials of the efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics, alone and in combination, in preventing diarrhoea in this patient group are warranted.
Topics: Colon; Diarrhea; Enteral Nutrition; Food, Formulated; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Probiotics; Saccharomyces; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 17637081
DOI: 10.1017/S0029665107005551 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2013Enteral feeding tubes for preterm infants may be placed in the stomach (gastric tube feeding) or in the upper small bowel (transpyloric tube feeding). There are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Enteral feeding tubes for preterm infants may be placed in the stomach (gastric tube feeding) or in the upper small bowel (transpyloric tube feeding). There are potential advantages and disadvantages to both routes.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effect of feeding via the transpyloric route versus feeding via the gastric route on feeding tolerance, growth and development, and adverse consequences (death, gastro-intestinal disturbance including necrotising enterocolitis, aspiration pneumonia, chronic lung disease, pyloric stenosis) in preterm infants.
SEARCH METHODS
We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (to June 2012), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing transpyloric with gastric tube feeding in preterm infants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors. We synthesised data using a fixed-effect model and reported typical risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and mean difference (MD).
MAIN RESULTS
We found nine eligible trials in which a total of 359 preterm infants participated. All of the trials contained methodological weaknesses with lack of allocation concealment, absence of blinding of caregivers or assessors, and incomplete follow-up being the major potential sources of bias. The included trials did not detect any statistically significant effects on feeding tolerance or in-hospital growth rates. Meta-analyses found that infants allocated to receive transpyloric feeding had a higher risk of gastro-intestinal disturbance (typical RR 1.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 2.09); typical RD 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.17); number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 10 (95% CI 6 to 50); six studies, 245 infants) and all-case mortality (typical RR 2.46 (95% CI 1.36 to 4.46); typical RD 0.16 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.26); NNTH 6 (95% CI 4 to 14); six studies, 217 infants). However, the trial that contributed most weight to these findings was likely to have been affected by selective allocation of the less mature and sicker infants to transpyloric feeding. We did not find any statistically significant differences in the incidence of other adverse events, including necrotising enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and aspiration pneumonia.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The available data do not provide evidence of any beneficial effect of transpyloric feeding for preterm infants. Some evidence of harm exists, including a higher risk of gastrointestinal disturbance and mortality, but these findings should be interpreted and applied cautiously because of methodological weaknesses in the included trials.
Topics: Enteral Nutrition; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Pylorus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 23450542
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub3 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2021We aimed to summarize the enteral nutrition (EN) management of stroke patients according to recent evidence. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to summarize the enteral nutrition (EN) management of stroke patients according to recent evidence.
BACKGROUND
Stroke patients have a high incidence of dysphagia, which is the main cause of malnutrition, and stroke with malnutrition leads to high recurrence and mortality. Insufficient food intake caused by dysphagia is the main cause of malnutrition in stroke patients, which is associated with poor prognosis, increased mortality, and deteriorated outcomes in patients with stroke. Dehydration is also worthy of attention.
METHODS
Non-systematic searches of the PubMed database were conducted to retrieve relevant English-language articles, and the CNKI and Wanfang database were searched for relevant Chinese-language articles. Fifteen recent guidelines or expert consensuses on the clinical nutritional management of stroke patients were published between 2013 and 2021, of which eight are from China.
CONCLUSIONS
Before providing nutritional support, swallowing, hydration, and risk of malnutrition need to be screened by a dietitian or professional. Although the initiation time of nutritional support is different in each guideline, tube feeding is preferable for patients with dysphagia. The appropriate dosage, formula, and treatment of complications need to be further studied. Also, nutritional support for stroke patients at different stages needs to be further improved. The continuous improvement and details of stroke nutrition guidelines contribute to standardized clinical nutrition practices and benefit patients.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Enteral Nutrition; Humans; Malnutrition; Nutritional Support; Stroke
PubMed: 34763477
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2922